Poll: Are you okay with these rule changes?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Yes.
50.00%
No, I would like something to change. (Post What)
33.33%
FireDog is a a bad GM cause he forgot this.
16.67%
Total
6 vote(s)
100%
* You voted for this item.

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
[10] Rules Revision [In-Game and In-Character Policies]
#21
*Flops around*

So, there's that at least. Though I'd still say staying in between with the censorship is a bit odd to me, but that's how it's been, I suppose it wouldn't hurt to keep it like it is.

Anyways, I'll take a break from this topic and let you guys handle the rest. Because. Reasons. And I need some alcohol.
[sup]Tell me your story.[/sup]
#22
Go get yourself some vodka and write a back-story, big man.
#23
Why do you inspire me so to create a Russian-Like drunkard?

xD I'll think about it. Anyways, enough OOC in this. Carry on!
[sup]Tell me your story.[/sup]
#24
Reminder of rule 1 and to respect others' opinions, Ryu. Keep things civilized.
#25
I don't think the rule limiting the number of pets you can have is needed. It should be common sense not to have more animals than you can take care of. What if your character's animal has offspring? Do you kill them just for the sake of this rule? It seems like a meaningless restriction to me, and should be kept on a case-by-case basis instead of a single rule.


 
  


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  [11] Rules Revison [Activity Policies] ccspycrab 0 3,700 06-04-2014, 01:52 PM
Last Post: ccspycrab
  [8] Rules Revision [Stealing Rules] FireDog 9 15,846 24-02-2014, 10:22 AM
Last Post: Tigady
  [7] Rules Revision [IC Death Rules] FireDog 0 3,428 28-01-2014, 04:37 PM
Last Post: FireDog

Forum Jump:

[10] Rules Revision [In-Game and In-Character Policies]00