15-10-2013, 10:59 PM
1. Don't forget to bump this bloody thread.
2. You've misspelt 'arguments', BUT
3. Consistency. I believe formally it's called parallel structure, but the jist of it is... MAKE YOUR LISTS CONSISTENT.
This means 'No heated arguements' should be 'No out-of-character fighting/heated arguing', and should probably be before 'Keep all conversation topics, roleplay and language within the PG-13 guidelines', just like in the other lists.
4. Furthermore, I would add 'No insulting other players out-of-character' between PG 13 and arguing, under /msg, both for consistency and for the simple fact that insults should be more not-allowed than arguing.
5. Again for consistency, the 'No spamming or all caps spamming' under /ch l should be two separate rules, just like it is under /ch g
I think that's everything I could possibly complain about.
2. You've misspelt 'arguments', BUT
3. Consistency. I believe formally it's called parallel structure, but the jist of it is... MAKE YOUR LISTS CONSISTENT.
This means 'No heated arguements' should be 'No out-of-character fighting/heated arguing', and should probably be before 'Keep all conversation topics, roleplay and language within the PG-13 guidelines', just like in the other lists.
4. Furthermore, I would add 'No insulting other players out-of-character' between PG 13 and arguing, under /msg, both for consistency and for the simple fact that insults should be more not-allowed than arguing.
5. Again for consistency, the 'No spamming or all caps spamming' under /ch l should be two separate rules, just like it is under /ch g
I think that's everything I could possibly complain about.
![[Image: a88823d4-5335-49cc-91b4-f8c511e214f8_zps...1409225114]](http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g158/mnguy3/a88823d4-5335-49cc-91b4-f8c511e214f8_zpsf21a961a.png?t=1409225114)