Poll: Are you okay with these rule changes?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Yes, I am okay with these rule changes.
33.33%
No, I do not like something and this is why. (Post)
66.67%
You're grammer suks lol
0%
Total
6 vote(s)
100%
* You voted for this item.

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
[6] Rules Revison [Building Rules]
#5
I think it should be a little bit more explained than simply "IC or OOC", because then people can simply skip around RP'ing with the Town Owner and just ask OOC, which I view as lazy and just wastes a chance for RP. Perhaps either include some examples for both, or put in a clause that makes the use of OOC asking needs to be situational.
[Image: jUGp0nj.gif]
  


Messages In This Thread
[6] Rules Revison [Building Rules] - by FireDog - 30-11-2013, 03:11 PM
RE: [6] Rules Revison [Building Rules] - by cerberus23 - 02-12-2013, 12:46 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Rules Page [test] Zarkaylia 0 9,059 18-08-2016, 02:14 PM
Last Post: Zarkaylia
  [11] Rules Revison [Activity Policies] ccspycrab 0 3,713 06-04-2014, 01:52 PM
Last Post: ccspycrab
  [10] Rules Revision [In-Game and In-Character Policies] FireDog 25 47,737 06-04-2014, 10:18 AM
Last Post: SentaiPink
  [9] Rules Revison [Town/Guild/Clan/Etc Rules] FireDog 2 5,228 20-03-2014, 08:05 AM
Last Post: Zarkaylia
  [5] Rules Revison [Powergaming Rules] ccspycrab 3 15,476 12-03-2014, 02:33 PM
Last Post: 3llusive

Forum Jump:

[6] Rules Revison [Building Rules]00