Poll: Are you okay with these rule changes?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Yes.
50.00%
No, I would like something to change. (Post What)
33.33%
FireDog is a a bad GM cause he forgot this.
16.67%
Total
6 vote(s)
100%
* You voted for this item.

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
[10] Rules Revision [In-Game and In-Character Policies]
#16
Starting that with such heavy sarcasm may not have been the most professional way to deal with this debate, but I won't say much more on the matter. You seem to be under the impression that people want characters to be retconned, no, that would be very unfair. This isn't a demand for retroactive action, nor is it a call for the removal of characters with this in their backstories. Honestly, I just don't have the drive to argue anymore, I'm clearly in the minority and clearly this cannot be reconciled. I think that the current stance of the server is wrong, most people apparently don't. The problem for me personally was not whether rape was actually typed out or not, I felt that it had no place on the server period. It's a shame it all had to happen this way I suppose. I resent the implication that I am childish, but I can't bring myself to fight anymore, maybe other people will continue the discussion...I just can't. I'll find a way to justify the removal of Mercedes, and quietly slip away.
  


Messages In This Thread
RE: [10] Rules Revision [In-Game and In-Character Policies] - by Ziofera - 29-03-2014, 08:46 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  [11] Rules Revison [Activity Policies] ccspycrab 0 3,698 06-04-2014, 01:52 PM
Last Post: ccspycrab
  [8] Rules Revision [Stealing Rules] FireDog 9 15,840 24-02-2014, 10:22 AM
Last Post: Tigady
  [7] Rules Revision [IC Death Rules] FireDog 0 3,425 28-01-2014, 04:37 PM
Last Post: FireDog

Forum Jump:

[10] Rules Revision [In-Game and In-Character Policies]00