Poll: Are you okay with these rule changes?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Yes.
50.00%
No, I would like something to change. (Post What)
33.33%
FireDog is a a bad GM cause he forgot this.
16.67%
Total
6 vote(s)
100%
* You voted for this item.

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
[10] Rules Revision [In-Game and In-Character Policies]
#26
This rule is more so to keep players from having a whole pack of wolves and claiming that they mostly take care of themselves but do everything the hypothetical characters says. There's a lot of room for powergaming when it comes to pets. But perhaps the rule could be revised to be a bit friendlier to characters inclined for breeding.

"If an animal breeds, the offspring cannot be kept if the number of animals exceeds the allowed amount for that character or what they could realistically tend. The animals must be found other homes or otherwise be removed. This must be done before the animals reach adulthood."

I am not sure how else to tackle that issue... Anyone else have a suggestion?
  


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  [11] Rules Revison [Activity Policies] ccspycrab 0 3,711 06-04-2014, 01:52 PM
Last Post: ccspycrab
  [8] Rules Revision [Stealing Rules] FireDog 9 15,869 24-02-2014, 10:22 AM
Last Post: Tigady
  [7] Rules Revision [IC Death Rules] FireDog 0 3,439 28-01-2014, 04:37 PM
Last Post: FireDog

Forum Jump:

[10] Rules Revision [In-Game and In-Character Policies]00