[Good_Old_Epsilon]

Didn't mean to offend anyone with that, you have my apologies.

I need to say you just earned my respect, thank you for being polite. It's not often I meet such polite Forum attenders.

Obviously that's an issue with the player themselves being childish and insecure. Staff would handle any such instances, I'm sure. Personally, I'm straight and I'm somewhat uncomfortable with the prospect of role playing a character who is not.

Yeap, yeap and yeap. I think the issue is the player using their orientation as a shield when they throw a hissy fit, which should be identified by the staff as an issue and thwarted.

I very seriously doubt anyone who doesn't have serious mental issues can find much fault with me for that. It simply doesn't make someone a homophobe to be uncomfortable with homosexuality from a personal sense. In the same way a homosexual would be uncomfortable with sexual advances from the opposite gender. I'm perfectly fine with whatever sexuality someone has, but simply put, I will stick to mine.

Yeap, the idea is that I'm sticking to mine and everyone else can do what they want. That's the idea of sexual equality in my mind, nothing is enforced on anyone, from neither sides.

/shrug/ I simply mean that we shouldn't be trying to force it into a specific genre. Saying it can be called a fantasy or medieval server is one thing, but attempting to force the server to follow a set of 'guidelines' set by a genre is just fallacy, in my humble opinion.

What I meant, is that for example:

- Homosexual marriages are allowed.
- Electricity has not yet been discovered.
- We use Runes/Redstone to power most things.
- Flying is not something that has been thought of yet.
- Magic does not exist.

I'm thinking more like information, informing the player, rather than limitations. In terms of Genre, I think "General Fantasy" would suit it, it's broad enough to cover a lot of things.

Feel free to retort, no bad blood here really. I'm pretty sure I agree with you on everything here in one way or another, lol.

I'm not as much retorting, because that means opposing you in an argument. I'm thinking discussing is the better word, what could be or what can't, to set a thinking middle-ground.

And nope, no bad blood. You're more than a-okay in my eyes.